Saturday, October 4, 2008

Mirrors and Voice, Part 3: Reconciling the Absence


Reconciling the Absence

The frequent question to be asked from this point, of course, is, if all representations are faulty because the represented itself and the act of representation are inherently faulty, where do we go from there? How can questions be answered if both the answer and the questions asked are inherently irrelevant? Many critics seem to have either wanted to stop here, as Derrida, or continue from a different juncture within the old structures entirely, like Jameson. If the same thought-process were to be maintained, however, the necessary next step from the point of tearing down prior “truths” would entail the reconstruction of new Art-based structures within the new-found understanding. Where critics seem to have been rare in asserting the necessity of this step and advocating for it, Artists themselves have taken up the pursuit, and constructed representational worlds based on assumptions that have become understood in the time since Borges’ work on the subject. The later work of Samuel Beckett provides a near-perfect example of the sort of reconstruction required to complete the postmodern project in relation to the problem of representation.

( be continued...)


Anonymous said...

I tried to post a reply, this weekend. But I kept getting an error message.

Now, every time I try to recreate that post, it ends up feeling inferior to how I initially worded it.


Bernard P. Provencher LeVautour said...

I'm sorry...

Maybe the jist of the idea that you had? I'm curious...